Local parental permission steps was in fact then followed in advance of survey administration. People done this new self-given survey throughout one class months and you will filed its solutions actually on a computer-scannable booklet otherwise address sheet. For each questionnaire included the next matter to determine frequency off previously having had intercourse: “Maybe you have had sexual intercourse?” Response options have been “yes” and “zero.” Zero definition to have intercourse was given.
For the federal YRBS, incidence prices have been calculated total and also by grade (9th, tenth, 11th, otherwise 12th), intercourse (man or woman), and battle/ethnicity (non-Latina white [white], black colored, otherwise Hispanic). With the county YRBSs, prevalence prices had been computed by grade. Statistical app was utilized so you can make up the brand new state-of-the-art take to habits throughout the analyses.
Logistic regression analyses were used to be the cause of every available prices; manage having alterations in sex, amounts, and battle/ethnicity over time; and you can evaluate statistically significant (p
* Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Vegas, The fresh new Hampshire, Ny, New york, Northern Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Area, South carolina, Southern area Dakota, West Virginia, and you can Wyoming.
Recommendations
- Heywood W, Patrick K, Smith Am, Pitts MK. Contacts anywhere between very early very first sexual intercourse and soon after intimate and you can reproductive outcomes: a logical writeup on population-depending data. Arch Intercourse Behav 2015;–69. CrossRef additional iconPubMed additional icon
- Kaestle Ce, Halpern CT, Miller Rest room, Ford California. Early age to start with sexual activity and sexually carried attacks into the teens and you may young adults. In the morning J Epidemiol 2005;–80. CrossRef exterior iconPubMed outside symbol
- Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, ainsi que al. Teens chance behavior security-United states, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016;65(No. SS-6). PubMed external icon
- Giedd JN. Brand new electronic trend and you can adolescent mind advancement. J Adolesc Wellness 2012;–5. CrossRef outside iconPubMed additional symbol
- Workplace out of Teenage Health. Teenager Pregnancy Reduction Program. Atlanta, GA: All of us Department off Health and Peoples Characteristics, Workplace out-of Teenage Fitness; 2017. outside symbol
- Stark P, Noel Am. Trends inside senior school dropout and you may end costs regarding Joined States: 1972–2012. Report zero. NCES 2015–015. Arizona, DC: You Department away from Degree, Federal Center getting Knowledge Statistics; 2015. pdf symbol outside symbol
- Brener ND, Mcmanus T, Galuska Da, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Reliability and you can legitimacy from notice-advertised height and weight certainly one of kids. J Adolesc Fitness 2003;–7. CrossRef external iconPubMed additional symbol
- American Academy out of Pediatrics. Values out of adolescence. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy from Pediatrics; 2015. exterior icon
Contour 1. Trends for the frequency of actually that have had sexual intercourse certainly one of highest school students, from the level in school and you can race/ethnicity — national Teens Exposure Conclusion Surveys, You, 2005–2015
The newest shape more than comprises two-line graphs demonstrating brand new trend from inside the incidence away from ever that have got sexual intercourse one of high school students, by the amount in school and also by competition/ethnicity, centered on analysis regarding Youthfulness Chance Decisions Surveys through the 2005–2015.
Shape dos. Styles for the frequency away from ever before which have had intercourse certainly one of higher school college students, because of the level contained in this state -Teens Chance Conclusion Studies, 31 States, 2005–2015
Brand new contour a lot more than try a map of one’s Us indicating style inside frequency from ever before with had sexual activity certainly highest school people, by the amounts inside condition to possess 31 states, according to investigation on Teens Chance Choices Surveys to own 29 Claims throughout 2005–2015.
Table. Manner inside incidence regarding ever before with had intercourse certainly one of highest college pupils, by intercourse, race/ethnicity, and you can stages at school — Federal Youthfulness Risk Choices Studies, All of us, 2005–2015
| Characteristic | Frequency, % | Development p-value* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2007 | 2009 | 2011 | 2013 | 2015 | Linear | Quadratic | |
| Full | 46.8 | 47.8 | 46.0 | 47.4 | 46.8 | 41.2 | 0.0069 † | 0.0770 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Men | 47.nine | forty-two.8 | 46.step 1 | forty two.2 | 47.5 | 43.dos | 0.0106 † | 0.1919 |
| Females | forty-five.eight | forty-five.nine | forty-five.seven | forty five.6 | 46.0 | 39.dos | 0.0176 † | 0.0648 |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||
| White § | 43.0 | 43.seven | 42.0 | 44.step 3 | 43.eight | 39.9 | 0.3711 | 0.4370 |
| Black colored § | 67.six | 66.5 | 65.2 | sixty.0 | sixty.six | forty eight.5 | 0.0000 † | 0.0163 † |
| Hispanic | 51.0 | 52.0 | forty two.1 | 48.6 | 44.dos | 42.5 | 0.0003 † | 0.1194 |
| 9th degrees | 34.3 | 32.8 | 30.six | thirty two.nine | 29.0 | 24.step one | 0.0000 † | 0.0541 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 39.3 | 38.step one | 33.six | 37.8 | 32.0 | twenty seven.step three | 0.0000 † | 0.1789 |
| Female | 29.step 3 | 27.4 | 31.step 3 | 27.8 | 28.1 | 20.eight | 0.0080 † | 0.0713 |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||
| White § | 30.4 | 25.8 | twenty four.9 | 27.3 | twenty six.5 | 21.step 3 | 0.0614 | 0.8057 |
| Black colored § | 55.4 | 52.5 | 51.5 | forty eight.dos | 43.1 | 31.4 | 0.0000 † | 0.0417 † |
| Hispanic | 40.5 | 39.eight | 37.9 | 36.8 | 30.6 | 25.9 | 0.0001 † | 0.0637 |
| 10th values | 42.8 | 43.8 | forty.nine | 43.8 | 41.4 | 35.eight | 0.0449 † | 0.1769 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 41.5 | forty-five.six | 41.nine | forty-two.5 | 41.1 | 37.nine | 0.1283 | 0.2272 |
| Female | 49.0 | 41.nine | 39.6 | 43.0 | 41.eight | 33.5 | 0.0506 | 0.2927 |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||
| White § | 37.5 | 38.1 | 34.7 | 38.4 | thirty five.cuatro | thirty-two.8 | 0.3625 | 0.7079 |
| Black § | 66.cuatro | 66.cuatro | 64.8 | 58.4 | 62.6 | 47.3 | 0.0002 † | 0.0784 |
| Hispanic | 46.9 | forty-two.step 1 | 49.8 | 46.5 | forty-five.8 | thirty-six.0 | 0.0095 † | 0.0674 |
| 11th grade | 51.cuatro | 55.5 | 53.0 | 53.dos | 54.1 | forty-two.6 | 0.3631 | 0.1934 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | fifty.six | 57.step 3 | 53.4 | 54.5 | 54.step 3 | 51.2 | 0.5238 | 0.1321 |
| Female | 52.step 1 | 53.6 | 52.5 | 51.9 | 53.9 | forty-eight.2 | 0.3724 | 0.3940 |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||
| Light § | 47.step 3 | 52.step three | forty-two.8 | 50.5 | 53.0 | 47.8 | 0.7905 | 0.3021 |
| Black colored § | 74.8 | 74.step 1 | 71.step three | 63.six | 63.5 | 57.2 | 0.0000 † | 0.8166 |
| Hispanic | 55.0 | 58.step 1 | 56.dos | 56.0 | 56.eight | 52.2 | 0.2288 | 0.2815 |
| 12th degree | 63.step one | 64.six | 62.3 | 63.step 1 | 64.1 | 58.step 1 | 0.0811 | 0.2155 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 63.8 | 62.8 | 59.six | 62.six | 65.4 | 59.0 | 0.3548 | 0.9941 |
| Female | 62.cuatro | 66.dos | 65.0 | 63.six | 62.8 | 57.dos | 0.0328 † | 0.0276 † |
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||
| White § | sixty.5 | 62.step 1 | 60.6 | 62.5 | 61.0 | 58.8 | 0.6164 | 0.3767 |
| Black colored § | 80.0 | 81.8 | 79.7 | 73.9 | 77.4 | 63.step three | 0.0002 † | 0.1352 |
| Hispanic | 69.eight | 70.5 | 64.7 | 60.0 | 69.step three | sixty.7 | 0.0336 † | 0.5242 |