Hypotheses 2 and 3 proposed that employees in mixed-gender dyads would receive lower performance ratings than employees in same-gender dyads and that mixed-gender dyads would moderate the hookup near me Red Deer Canada effects of LMX on performance ratings. We found that, in comparison to men with male supervisors, only women with male supervisors have a statistically significant difference in ratings and in fact the ratings are higher. As shown in table 3 models 1a and 1b, women with male supervisors received higher ratings on both in-role performance (? = 0.17, t = 3.26, p < .01) and ICB (? = 0.15, t = 3.04, p < .01) than that of men with male supervisors. In addition, the interaction effect of LMX and gender dyad was significant for women with a male supervisor. The coefficients for the interaction of LMX with mixed-gender dyads comprised of a male supervisor and female subordinate on ratings of in-role performance (? = ?0.15, t = ?2.50, p < .05) and ICB (? = ?0.17, t = ?2.59, p < .05) were negative and statistically significant, which suggested that the strength of the relationship between LMX and performance ratings for women with male supervisors was weaker than that for men with male supervisors.
Within these habits, the partnership ranging from LMX and gratification stays extreme and confident, and you can females having men executives still discover highest abilities feedback than just boys which have men supervisors
In order to compare the gender dyad groups to other base groups (female supervisors with female subordinates and female supervisors with male subordinates), we also conducted supplemental regression analyses, results of which are shown in Appendix 2. This analysis enables us to determine whether the differences for women with male supervisors still holds true when compared against men and women with female supervisors. The supplemental analyses indicated that women with male supervisors received significantly higher ratings of in-role performance than women (? = 0.12, t = 2.02, p < .05) or men (? = 0.25, t = 3.66, p < .01) with female supervisors. Women with male supervisors also received higher ratings of ICB than women (? = 0.10, t = 1.78, p < .10) or men (? = 0.16, t = 2.63, p < .05) with female supervisors. One additional finding that emerged was that men with female supervisors received significantly lower ratings on in-role performance than women with female supervisors (? = ?0.12, t = 2.07, p < .05). We also conducted supplemental analyses that indicated that the interaction effect of LMX and dyadic gender for women with male supervisors was significant in comparison to men and women with female supervisors (see Models 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4b in Appendix 2). Taken altogether, our results provided mixed support for Hypotheses 2 and 3.
Because the shown inside numbers 2a and you can 2b, for subordinates who’d a high-quality experience of their supervisor, supervisor and you can subordinate sex didn’t have any effect on performance evaluations
Figures 2a and you will 2b provide visual representations of your own relationships regarding LMX and you may dyad sex for the recommendations regarding staff for the-character abilities and you may ICB. As development of your communication outcomes found in the analyses is similar all over all regression designs-that is, the fresh new interaction name ranging from LMX and dyad gender for females having male supervisors somewhat related to results when comparing to guys which have men managers and you may folk with people administrators-become parsimonious we plot precisely the marginal effects into the connections of LMX with male supervisor and you may women under facing you to getting men supervisor and you will men under to your studies out-of into the-part abilities and ICB. To put it differently, high-LMX employees acquired powerful evaluations it doesn’t matter if or not these people were in a blended- otherwise exact same-gender dyad. However, it was not the case having lower-LMX teams. In the event the relationships top quality try lower, girls having a male manager received high for the-character show and you may ICB choices ratings than just boys with a masculine supervisor.